The S&P Dividend Aristocrats Stay Criteria Beaters in Pan Asia– Indexology ® Blog Site

{“page”:0,” year”:2024,” monthnum”:1,” day”:29,” name”:” the-sp-dividend-aristocrats-remain-benchmark-beaters-in-pan-asia”,” mistake”:””,” m”:””,” p”:0,” post_parent”:””,” subpost”:””,” subpost_id”:””,” accessory”:””,” attachment_id”:0,” pagename”:””,” page_id”:0,” 2nd”:””,” minute”:””,” hour”:””,” w”:0,” category_name”:””,” tag”:””,” feline”:””,” tag_id”:””,” author”:””,” author_name”:””,” feed”:””,” tb”:””,” paged”:0,” meta_key”:””,” meta_value”:””,” sneak peek”:””,” s”:””,” sentence”:””,” title”:””,” fields”:””,” menu_order”:””,” embed”:””,” classification __ in”: [],” classification __ not_in”: [],” classification __ and”: [],” post __ in”: [],” post __ not_in”: [],” post_name __ in”: [],” tag __ in”: [],” tag __ not_in”: [],” tag __ and”: [],” tag_slug __ in”: [],” tag_slug __ and”: [],” post_parent __ in”: [],” post_parent __ not_in”: [],” author __ in”: [],” author __ not_in”: [],” search_columns”: [],” ignore_sticky_posts”: incorrect,” suppress_filters”: incorrect,” cache_results”: real,” update_post_term_cache”: real,” update_menu_item_cache”: incorrect,” lazy_load_term_meta”: real,” update_post_meta_cache”: real,” post_type”:””,” posts_per_page”:” 5″,” nopaging”: incorrect,” comments_per_page”:” 50″,” no_found_rows”: incorrect,” order”:” DESC”}

[{“display”:”Craig Lazzara”,”title”:”Managing Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/craig_lazzara-353.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Tim Edwards”,”title”:”Managing Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/timothy_edwards-368.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Hamish Preston”,”title”:”Head of U.S. Equities”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/hamish_preston-512.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Anu Ganti”,”title”:”Senior Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/anu_ganti-505.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Fiona Boal”,”title”:”Managing Director, Global Head of Equities”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/fiona_boal-317.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Phillip Brzenk”,”title”:”Managing Director, Global Head of Multi-Asset Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/phillip_brzenk-325.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Wenli Bill Hao”,”title”:”Director, Factors and Dividends Indices, Product Management and Development”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/bill_hao-351.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Howard Silverblatt”,”title”:”Senior Index Analyst, Product Management”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/howard_silverblatt-197.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”John Welling”,”title”:”Director, Global Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/john_welling-246.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Michael Orzano”,”title”:”Senior Director, Global Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/Mike.Orzano-231.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Maria Sanchez”,”title”:”Director, Sustainability Index Product Management, U.S. Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/maria_sanchez-527.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Shaun Wurzbach”,”title”:”Managing Director, Head of Commercial Group (North America)”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/shaun_wurzbach-200.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Silvia Kitchener”,”title”:”Director, Global Equity Indices, Latin America”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/silvia_kitchener-522.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Akash Jain”,”title”:”Director, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/akash_jain-348.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Ved Malla”,”title”:”Associate Director, Client Coverage”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/ved_malla-347.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Rupert Watts”,”title”:”Head of Factors and Dividends”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/rupert_watts-366.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Jason Giordano”,”title”:”Director, Fixed Income, Product Management”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/jason_giordano-378.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Brian Luke”,”title”:”Senior Director, Head of Commodities, Real & Digital Assets”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/brian.luke-509.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Qing Li”,”title”:”Director, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/qing_li-190.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Sherifa Issifu”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, U.S. Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/sherifa_issifu-518.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”George Valantasis”,”title”:”Associate Director, Factors and Dividends”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/george-valantasis-453.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Glenn Doody”,”title”:”Vice President, Product Management, Technology Innovation and Specialty Products”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/glenn_doody-517.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Priscilla Luk”,”title”:”Managing Director, Global Research & Design, APAC”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/priscilla_luk-228.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Liyu Zeng”,”title”:”Director, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/liyu_zeng-252.png”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Sean Freer”,”title”:”Director, Global Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/sean_freer-490.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Barbara Velado”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, Research & Design, Sustainability Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/barbara_velado-413.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Benedek Vu00f6ru00f6s”,”title”:”Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/benedek_voros-440.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Cristopher Anguiano”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, U.S. Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/cristopher_anguiano-506.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Jason Ye”,”title”:”Director, Factors and Thematics Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/Jason%20Ye-448.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Michael Mell”,”title”:”Global Head of Custom Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/michael_mell-362.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Maya Beyhan”,”title”:”Senior Director, ESG Specialist, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/maya.beyhan-480.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Andrew Innes”,”title”:”Head of Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/andrew_innes-189.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Joseph Nelesen”,”title”:”Senior Director, Index Investment Strategy”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/joseph_nelesen-452.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Fei Wang”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, U.S. Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/fei_wang-443.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Izzy Wang”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, Factors and Dividends”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Rachel Du”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, Global Research & Design”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/rachel_du-365.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Jaspreet Duhra”,”title”:”Managing Director, Global Head of Sustainability Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/jaspreet_duhra-504.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Srineel Jalagani”,”title”:”Senior Director, Thematic Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/srineel_jalagani-446.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Eduardo Olazabal”,”title”:”Senior Analyst, Global Equity Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/eduardo_olazabal-451.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Ari Rajendra”,”title”:”Senior Director, Head of Thematic Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/Ari.Rajendra-524.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Daniel Perrone”,”title”:”Former Director and Head of Operations, ESG Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/daniel_perrone-387.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Louis Bellucci”,”title”:”Senior Director, Index Governance”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/louis_bellucci-377.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Elizabeth Bebb”,”title”:”Director, Factor & Dividend Indices”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/elizabeth_bebb-511.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Margaret Dorn”,”title”:”Senior Director, Head of ESG Indices, North America”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/margaret.dorn-390.jpg”,”url”:””},{“display”:”Raghu Ramachandran”,”title”:”Head of Insurance Asset Channel”,”image”:”/wp-content/authors/raghu_ramachandram-288.jpg”,”url”:””}]

The S&P Dividend Aristocrats Stay Criteria Beaters in Pan Asia

Contributor Image

While the majority of dividend techniques underperformed their particular standards in 2023, the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats ®(* )remarkably surpassed the S&P Pan Asia BMI by around 3.50% (see Exhibition 1). Additionally, in spite of the outperformance, the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats’ appraisals and dividend yield stayed beneficial relative to the criteria (see Displays 3 and 4). This blog site will take a look at these metrics in more information, in addition to offering a comprehensive efficiency attribution for 2023. As Exhibition 1 reveals, the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats’ strong 2023 efficiency even more enhanced its long-lasting outperformance versus the S&P Pan Asia BMI. Returning to Dec. 31, 2001, the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats has actually surpassed the S&P Pan Asia BMI usually by 2.35% every year. Furthermore, this long-lasting outperformance has actually been accomplished while likewise providing a lower full-period volatility, optimum drawdown and disadvantage capture ratio.

Exhibition 2 shows the 2023 efficiency attribution for the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats and S&P Pan Asia BMI. As displayed in the attribution analysis columns, the overall outperformance amounted to 3.50%, with 7.15% due to the bottom-up stock choice impact and -3.65% from the allowance or sector impact. Infotech was the biggest positive-contributing sector for the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats, at 10.20%, with 10.78% from the choice impact and -0.58% due to the allowance impact.

The essential differentiator of the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats versus its criteria is the requirement that stocks need to increase dividends per share for a minimum of 7 successive years. This filter, in addition to the payment and dividend yield filter, might predisposition the index towards picking greater quality stocks considering that the capability to regularly grow dividends over the long term can be a sign of monetary strength and discipline.

Exhibition 3 shows the appraisal contrast and discount rate of the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats versus its criteria. The index is less expensive on all 3 metrics revealed, with a typical discount rate over the 3 metrics at around 34%. Disappointed in the table however essential however, is the return-on-equity (ROE) metric, which determines how effectively a business uses investor capital to produce earnings. The S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats has a 9.9% ROE versus 9.1% for the S&P Pan Asia BMI since Dec. 29, 2023.

As Exhibition 4 programs, the index’s dividend yield has actually been greater than the Pan Asia BMI’s dividend yield every year considering that 2009. Additionally, the typical dividend yield for the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats was 3.42% versus 2.47% for the S&P Pan Asia BMI over this duration. Remarkably, the year-end 2023 dividend yield for the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats was 3.71%, 8.40% greater than its historic typical versus the S&P Pan Asia BMI’s year-end 2023 dividend yield of 2.57%, just 4% greater than its historic average.


Following a strong year of efficiency in 2023 thanks to its reliable bottom-up stock choice, the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats heads into 2024 holding a dividend yield and appraisal benefit over its criteria. For financiers looking for an index with these worth and dividend yield direct exposures, in addition to different quality and dividend filters, the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats Index is an alternative to think about.

The posts on this blog site are viewpoints, not guidance. Please read our

Disclaimers S&P DJI’s International Islamic Equity Standards Rose Almost 12% in the Last Quarter, Outshining Traditional Standards in 2023

Take Legal Action Against Lee

S&P Global BMI rallied 11.4% for the quarter, completing the year with a remarkable 21.9% return. Middle East and North Africa (MENA) equities increased 6.4% in Q4, as determined by the S&P Pan Arab Composite, contributing to a 10.1% overall return for the year. Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations mainly published gains, led by Bahrain (23.4%) and Saudi Arabia (15.0%), while Kuwait was an exception, with a 6.3% loss. Shariah-compliant standards, consisting of the

S&P Global BMI Shariah and Dow Jones Islamic Market (DJIM) World Index, beat their standard equivalents by about 0.5% throughout the quarter, extending their outperformance to over 5% for the year and 19.7% cumulative over the previous 5 years. Mostly driven by its outperformance in the U.S., the criteria DJIM Established Markets Index stood apart for relative efficiency versus the standard criteria in 2023. The DJIM World Emerging Markets Index was a laggard, routing behind the standard criteria along with the industrialized market equivalent (see Exhibition 1). Chauffeurs of Shariah Index Efficiency in 2023

The outperformance of Shariah standards versus their standard equivalents typically enters focus through the lens of sectors. Throughout international stock exchange in general, a greater direct exposure to Infotech stocks within Islamic indices, no direct exposure to standard Financials (consisting of banks) and less direct exposure to extremely indebted business (such as energies) were the significant chauffeurs of the efficiency difference in 2015.

The Infotech sector’s 53% gain played a huge part in 2023, adding to majority of the S&P Global BMI Shariah’s overall return. Energy, Utilities and Customer Staples were the only sectors with losses for the year, while their effect was restricted provided their little representation in the index (see Exhibition 2).

International Sukuk Reversed in Q4 2023

The international sukuk market likewise had a strong quarter with a gain of 4.5%, as determined by the

Dow Jones Sukuk Index (ex-Reinvestment) The criteria ended the year with a 5.5% return, falling a little except the 5.7% yearly return of the iBoxx USD Overall, an international USD-denominated financial investment grade bond criteria. The local MENA and GCC Bond & & Sukuk standards got 5.2%. This post was very first released in IFN Volume 21 Problem 3 outdated Jan. 17, 2024.

The posts on this blog site are viewpoints, not guidance. Please read our

Disclaimers Tags


Contributor Image

The posts on this blog site are viewpoints, not guidance. Please read our

Disclaimers Tags

Take Legal Action Against Lee

prospective diversity advantages for Asian financiers who include U.S. equities to relieve their propensity for a home nation predisposition. Representing almost 60% of the international equity market, as determined by the S&P Global BMI, U.S. equities offer a bigger chance set beyond Asia, in addition to prospective diversity due to various financial structures and cycles in between markets, paired with varying sector direct exposures. The S&P 500 ®, commonly considered the very best single criteria of large-cap U.S. equities, has actually an approximated USD 5.7 trillion in properties tracking 1 the index and a robust trading community Market individuals can think about utilizing S&P 500 index-linked items to effectively trade U.S. equities. 2023 shows the effect of U.S. equity direct exposure for Asian financiers. A slower-than-expected financial healing in China with an ongoing home market recession and continuous U.S.-China stress weighed on market belief and efficiency, making China and Hong Kong amongst the relative underperformers with their S&P BMI market indices losing 10% and 15%, respectively (see Exhibition 1). Nevertheless, equity markets stayed resistant in other parts of the world that had more powerful financial backgrounds. Relieving inflation and the capacity for lower rate of interest caused a sharp market rally in the 4th quarter, with the S&P Global BMI closing the year with a strong 22% overall return in USD. The U.S. was a standout entertainer, with the S&P 500 publishing a 26% overall return in 2023, more than offsetting its loss of 18% in 2022.

Turnarounds were likewise seen at a sector level. Infotech was the best-performing sector, with a remarkable 58% gain in 2023 following a 28% loss in 2022; the sector contributed over 50% of the S&P 500’s return in 2023. Interaction Solutions and Customer Discretionary likewise published strong gains of 56% and 42%, respectively, after high losses of 40% and 37% in 2022, respectively. Energies and Energy were the only sectors that closed the year at a loss after favorable returns in 2022 (see Exhibition 2).

At a stock level, the

contribution to the marketplace return from a couple of choose stocks was uncommonly high in 2023 The so-called “Stunning 7,” specifically Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla, rose 112% usually for many years, contributing 58% of the S&P 500’s return. Nvidia was the very best entertainer amongst them, with a 239% gain, and ended up being the 4 th– biggest stock in the index (up from the 10 th position in the start of the year). This rally in mega caps led to the biggest underperformance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index 2 versus the S&P 500 (-12%) considering that the equal-weight index’s creation in 2003 (see Exhibition 3). With the Stunning 7 increasing 4% usually versus the S&P 500’s 1% (since Jan. 19, 2024), the relative efficiency of mega caps continues to be observed as we go into 2024. 1

Information since Dec. 31, 2022, based upon S&P Dow Jones Indices’ Yearly Study of Indexed Possessions 2

The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (EWI) is the equal-weight variation of the S&P 500. The index consists of the very same constituents as the capitalization-weighted S&P 500, however each business in the S&P 500 EWI is designated a repaired weight– or 0.2% of the index overall at each quarterly rebalance. See here more info about this index. The posts on this blog site are viewpoints, not guidance. Please read our

Disclaimers Tags

How does evaluating the S&P 600 for the leading 100 business based upon complimentary capital yield impact efficiency? S&P DJI’s Michael Mell takes a custom-made take a look at the Pacer United States Little Cap Money Cows Index with Sean O’Hara, President of Pacer ETFs and Cameron Dawson, Chief Financial Investment Officer at NewEdge Wealth.

Contributor Image

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: